US Airways voucher; [NJ]ohari windows - Omnia mutantur, nihil interit.
US Airways voucher; [NJ]ohari windows|
Actually, I answered this before remembering that you're in Dallas, not Pittsburgh now. I was going to say that if you want to travel anywhere from Pittsburgh, you kind of need to use US Airways. But I guess that's not true.
Still, it was an error made by someone, combined with ignorance on your part, so it's not likely that this situation will happen again. Stopping using US Airways would be either superstitious (If I stop using them, maybe they'll realize their mistake, or even get jinxed!) or impotently spiteful (If I stop using them, I'll get my revenge!)
However, my second choice would be to write more letters to them, because $100 is indeed not reasonable compensation for a $600 loss.
|Date:||February 14th, 2006 02:06 pm (UTC)|| |
I wasn't thinking totally clearly when I wrote this post. I probably should have mentioned that I, in a perhaps foolish show of bluster, explicitly said in my letter to them that I would not patronize them any more unless this matter was satisfactorily addressed. (Meaning it would make my statement into a lie to do so; not that I necessarily have an ethical problem with lying to a big corporation, particularly one that cheated me.)
I will hold back on revealing my own opinions any more than that at the moment, as that seems the only way to get useful feedback from others about this.
You can't lie retroactively. So long as you really believed it at the time, you weren't lying, even if you changed your mind afterwards.
Well, so says this ethicist.
|Date:||February 14th, 2006 08:08 pm (UTC)|| |
You're right; I forgot that “lie” isn't just a synonym for “untruth”. Incidentally, my statement wasn't really a truth or a lie; it was more like bullshit, in Frankfurt's sense
—that is, I didn't say it because it was true or false, I said it because I thought it was (slightly) more likely to produce the desired effect (although I did also determine at the time I wrote it that I would abide by it, if only to avoid internal inconsistency).