Kenn (kenoubi) wrote,

Quick post

For person X to depend on person Y means, for me, that person X would feel that there was something missing without person Y. Person X gets something from person Y that he doesn't feel he can get elsewhere.

For person X to have a meaningful relationship with person Y means, for me, that person X and person Y's relationship affects person X's life outside of just his relationship with person Y.

Lemma: if person X's entire life is taken up by his relationship with person Y, person X is incapable of having a meaningful relationship with person Y. Proof: person X has no life outside of his relationship with Y to be affected by it.

It seems that, for me, these two properties seem to be tied to one another in the following way: a relationship between me and X is meaningful only if I depend on person X. (That might be an “if and only if”—I'm not sure.) That is, if I don't depend on person X to some extent—if I don't get something from him that I can't get elsewhere—then I don't allow him to have any real effect on my life.

I'm not sure why this is, or whether it's beneficial. I'm only trying to analyze a situation, not solve a problem, at the moment.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.